校友李益伍来信

Dear masked Editor,

Thank you for your reply.

I am amazed that you kept coming up with new justification of why you do not want to remove my letters from the website - unless my letters served your interest.

How do you know my letters were addressed to unknown receipient with BCC. The letters was sent to you to request to remove them from your website, there is no need for me to BCC to your alledged "unpublished recipients." If you have proof that I have BCC to "unpublished recipients." and therefore justified to keep my private letters to you, please show to me - please don't tell me the information is confidential.

The letters to you was sent from my email program directly to your address and not via the website. If I want them to be published, I would have done so through the website.

DONT BE SO HARD-HEADED AND COME UP WITH MORE JUSTIFICATION AND LIVE HAPPILY FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE WITHOUT ANY REGRETS. PLEASE REMOVE MY LETTERS.

Rgds
AG Lee
(April 21, 2006 11:19 PM)

---

(编者按)：校友李益伍来信说：‘我见到傅文义学兄的文章，第一反应就是为何您竟然刊登他对我进行人身攻击的文章，给我套上“汉奸”、“走狗”的帽子。’编者刊出信件并且表明，‘编者虽然不同意“汉奸”、“走狗”一类帽子，现时还未达致删除的地步。各人的文稿，表达各自的观点，读者可从多方面，归纳自己的看法。’

此后，李君来信要求撤除该两封信。本站并不清楚内中理由，希望李君澄清有关事情，让读者了解有关发展。可惜，李君总是评击本站的建议。有些事也很费解，李君信后清楚注明：“Bcc 副本：关心南大的朋友”，李君却问本站如何知道他把信件BCC到本站不知道的收信者。

为使读者证实该信确有此“声明”，校友李益伍两封来信暂且留在网页几天，让大家验证，一星期内会把内容删除。这两星期的评论，开始的第一章是李君的《南大毕业生协会购买会所》。李君曾来信多次指责本站，本站还在考虑刊出有关通信，让读者明白有关经过。

李君今后来信，本站将尽可能在网页刊出。本站今后只在网页答复李君，读者可自作判断。